The Negative Mass Experiment: How Rubidium Atoms Flow Backward When Pushed
By cooling rubidium atoms to near absolute zero, physicists created a fluid with negative effective mass that accelerates backward when pushed, defying standard inertia.

Priya Ramaswamy · for The Unintuitive Universe · September 8, 2026
And it’s been measured. Every claim traced to the published research. Method & sources ↗
If you push a glass of water away from you, the liquid moves in the direction of your hand. This is the intuitive consequence of Isaac Newton's second law of motion, where force equals mass times acceleration. Because mass is almost always a positive quantity, a forward force yields forward acceleration.
But in 2017, physicists at Washington State University altered this basic physical relationship. By cooling a cloud of rubidium atoms to a fraction of a degree above absolute zero, they created a fluid that behaves as if its mass is negative. When pushed, it accelerates backward, traveling toward the source of the force rather than away from it.
Michael Forbes and his colleagues at Washington State University, along with researchers from Shanghai University, demonstrated this phenomenon by engineering a highly controlled quantum state known as a Bose-Einstein condensate. Under these extreme conditions, the ordinary rules of friction and inertia cease to apply, revealing a system that defies classical mechanics.
The Condensate and the Lattice
To observe negative mass, the researchers first had to eliminate the thermal noise that dominates matter at room temperature. They placed rubidium-87 atoms inside a vacuum chamber and used laser cooling to slow their motion.
In laser cooling, photons hit oncoming atoms head-on, absorbing their momentum and dropping their temperature. The team cooled the rubidium atoms to less than a microkelvin above absolute zero. At this point, the individual atoms lost their distinct classical identities. Their quantum mechanical wavefunctions expanded and overlapped, merging the particles into a single, giant quantum wave—a Bose-Einstein condensate.
In this state, the rubidium behaves as a superfluid, flowing without any viscosity or energy loss. To hold this delicate fluid in place, the researchers focused an array of lasers on the cloud, creating an optical trap. This trap acted like a bowl, confining the atoms to a region about a hundred micrometers across.
To introduce the negative mass behavior, the team used a second set of lasers to engineer a spin-orbit coupling. This technique links the intrinsic spin of the rubidium atoms—their quantum mechanical angular momentum—to their linear momentum.
The lasers act as an optical lattice, a series of alternating bright and dark bands that the atoms must navigate. By carefully tuning the frequencies of these lasers, the physicists could manipulate how the atoms interacted with this light barrier. This interaction changed how the atoms responded to external forces, effectively rewriting their relationship with inertia.
Flipping the Inertial Sign
In physics, mass can be defined in multiple ways. Gravitational mass determines how strongly an object attracts other matter. Inertial mass determines how much an object resists a change in its motion.
Inside the optical lattice, the rubidium atoms experience what physicists call "effective inertial mass." This is not the intrinsic mass of isolated rubidium atoms, but rather a measure of how the atoms accelerate when subjected to an external force while navigating the quantum landscape of the laser beams.
By adjusting the laser frequencies, the researchers forced the atoms to occupy a specific energy state where the relationship between their momentum and energy inverted. In a normal system, giving a particle more momentum increases its kinetic energy. In this engineered quantum state, however, increasing the momentum actually decreased the energy.
When the researchers turned off the outer boundary of the optical trap, the compressed rubidium gas began to expand outward, just as water would if a retaining wall were suddenly removed. The atoms in the center of the cloud rushed outward, pushing against the atoms at the outer edges.
For a normal fluid, this outward push causes the outer atoms to accelerate away from the center. But for the rubidium atoms in the negative effective mass state, the opposite occurred. The outward pressure from the expanding core acted as a push. Instead of accelerating outward, the edge atoms accelerated inward, collapsing back toward the center of the cloud.
The fluid flowed backward against the force. Measured.
Engineering Quantum Materials
The ability to control effective mass in a laboratory environment offers a clean, highly adjustable system for studying phenomena that are otherwise inaccessible.
In astrophysics, negative mass is often discussed in the context of cosmological theories, such as the behavior of neutron stars or the theoretical properties of dark energy. Because those systems cannot be manipulated or observed up close, physicists must rely on mathematical models. The rubidium experiment provides a physical analogue, a tabletop system where the fundamental equations governing negative mass can be tested directly.
Beyond astrophysics, the experiment has implications for the development of novel semiconductor materials. Electrons moving through the periodic crystal lattice of a semiconductor also experience an effective mass that can deviate from their mass in a vacuum. Under certain conditions, electrons can behave as if they have negative effective mass, which influences how they conduct electricity. Understanding how to manipulate these states in a cold atomic gas helps theorists design more efficient electronic components.
The Washington State University experiment did not create a new fundamental particle with intrinsic negative mass. Instead, it demonstrated that under the right quantum conditions, ordinary matter can be programmed to fight against its own inertia.
This article is AI-generated (synthetic) content, produced by an automated editorial system with human direction and review. Every claim is traced to published, peer-reviewed sources.